Overall, the RTX 3070 is a winner on performance, but the RTX 4060 claws it back with better architecture and much better efficiency to make it a close call for PC gamers. The newer 40-series card will have better ray tracing performance though, all with much lower power consumption. The large difference in both bus width and bandwidth means that the 3070 is more suited for gaming at higher resolutions than the RTX 4060. For a smoother experience in AAA games at 4K, the RTX 4070 is a better option due to its higher VRAM and memory bandwidth. Retrospective analyses highlight the importance of balancing power efficiency and performance to achieve strategic goals.
Overall Gaming Performance
It’s also a great choice for content creators who need a lot of memory bandwidth. It’s also a great choice for content creators who need a lot of memory and bandwidth. However, the RTX 3070 still has its strengths, particularly in terms of memory bandwidth and ray tracing performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 also has improved AI-enhanced graphics performance compared to the RTX 3070, thanks to its more advanced architecture.
- It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution.
- For example, in performance tests at 1080p, the RTX 4060 achieves 148 fps on average while maintaining a lower launch price.
- The RTX 3070 had an average peak power draw of 183 watts throughout our gaming tests, whereas the RTX 4060 had an average peak power draw of 123.
- The RTX 4060 focuses on energy efficiency and affordability, making it ideal for 1080p gaming.
- Its Ada Lovelace architecture also supports DLSS 3.0, enhancing frame rates without compromising visual quality.
Why is RTX 4060 better than RTX 3070?
- The RTX 3070 features a 256-bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 448 GB/s, making it faster than the RTX 4060, which has a 128-bit bus and 272 GB/s bandwidth.
- Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
- Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance.
- In all honesty, it’s not worth upgrading from your 30-series card to the RTX 4060, as the performance increases just aren’t worth it.
- Ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) are two standout features that elevate gaming and creative experiences.
- You take your gaming PC seriously.
- If you prioritize efficiency and cutting-edge features, the Ada Lovelace GPUs are the way to go.
In summary, the choice between these GPUs depends on balancing core count and architectural advancements. Both GPUs lack the memory capacity and computational scale required for training or deploying large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 or Llama 2. The RTX 4060 also supports DLSS 3, which leverages AI-based frame generation for real-time rendering enhancements, though this feature is less relevant to non-graphical AI workloads. However, the fourth-generation Tensor Cores add support for FP8 precision and structured sparsity, enabling faster processing of pruned neural networks. The RTX 4060, part of the Ada Lovelace generation, features 3072 CUDA cores and fourth-generation Tensor Cores. Specializes in gaming network security and troubleshooting online gaming issues.
Since the RTX 4060 sees around 20% less performance than the Ti variant, as explained by Dexerto, it will obviously perform worse than the RTX 3070. This is without making use of the DLSS frame generation. It shows the that 4060 massively benefits from this new tech, even without much improvement in the hardware itself for higher performance.
One of the most significant areas of development is in the field of graphics processing units (GPUs), which are the heart of any gaming or graphics-intensive computer system. You take your gaming PC seriously. Engage in community-driven discussions, showcase your builds on social media, and discover inspiration for your dream gaming setup.
RTX 4060 vs RTX 3070 specs
The RTX 4070, with its Ada Lovelace architecture, balances performance and power consumption, averaging around 200 watts during gaming sessions. However, the low power consumption of the RTX 4060 and DLSS 3 frame generation will help it catch back up and be a suitable choice, especially at 1080p. Consider your gaming resolution, budget, and power consumption needs. The RTX 4070, with its higher VRAM and memory bandwidth, excels in 4K gaming and demanding workstation tasks.
Base and Boost Clock Speeds
The choice is presented to most gamers in 2025. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? RTX 3070 has a 13.4% higher aggregate performance score.
At idle, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 consumes an average of 10 watts of power, while the RTX 3070 consumes an average of 20 watts. When it comes to power consumption, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 3070 have different power requirements. In the sagaspins casino bonus Assassin’s Creed Odyssey benchmark, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 averaged 60 frames per second (FPS) at 1440p resolution, while the RTX 3070 averaged 50 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is based on the Ampere architecture and features 4864 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, and a boost clock speed of up to 1.7 GHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 3072 CUDA cores, 24 GB of GDDR6X memory, and a boost clock speed of up to 2.5 GHz.
Why is RTX 3070 better than RTX 4060?
The RTX 3070 will have better performance than the RTX 4060, especially at native resolutions and without DLSS or RT enabled. It now also uses 4th generation Tensor Cores, this has both an effect on DLSS improvements and boosts raytracing performance beside the third-gen RT cores. Cooling overdesigned and large for the graphics power of the card The RTX 4060 excels in this area, consuming less power during gaming and idle states.
Which GPU is better for future-proofing and upgradeability?
Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs.
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
This underscores the importance of GPU generation in determining both performance and power efficiency. The 4060’s improved power efficiency and lower heat generation also make it a better choice for users who plan to upgrade their system in the future. Its improved performance capabilities and newer architecture make it better suited to handle demanding tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and AI-enhanced graphics. The 4060 is designed to provide high performance while minimizing power consumption and heat generation.